Automated decision-making (ADM) conducted by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms that significantly impact people's lives have been around for years and is likely here to stay.
In an article for the IAPP, Paysafe Director of Privacy Kiril Kalev and data privacy consultant Danica Vranjanin discuss an important distinction when determining legal requirements for ADM technology is to discern whether all data points regarding a system's decision impacting a human being were fed into an algorithm to render a decision. Failure to do so, they warn, could result in misinterpretations of the regulation's provisions.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 5,750 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.
