In an analysis of a recent High Court ruling, data protection specialist Jon Baines examines a decision by Mr Justice Richie to uphold an appeal against the striking out of claims brought by a woman who had been forced to flee safe homes due to the inadvertent disclosure of her addresses to an abusive partner.
The judgment involved a detailed analysis of the complex common law concept of "immunity from suit" and its application in different scenarios, including court proceedings. Mr Justice Richie highlighted the need for careful consideration of whether the claimed immunity applies to the specific facts of each case, particularly in the context of disclosure of confidential information. The judge concluded that a balancing exercise should be applied to determine if immunity is justified, especially in cases involving extraneous or administrative matters rather than evidence directly related to the case.
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,350 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.
