A ruling in Scotland by the Outer House of the Court of Session has refused to grant an order sought by taxi driver Robert Bartosik under the Data Protection Act (2018) for the erasure of personal data held by Police Scotland and compensations, despite the fact the information turned out to be inaccurate. The court found that while s38 of the DPA18 requires data held for law enforcement purposes to be accurate: "Witness statements are by their nature subjective and are not subject to the requirement of accuracy contained in section 38 of the 2018 Act."
What is this page?
You are reading a summary article on the Privacy Newsfeed, a free resource for DPOs and other professionals with privacy or data protection responsibilities helping them stay informed of industry news all in one place. The information here is a brief snippet relating to a single piece of original content or several articles about a common topic or thread. The main contributor is listed in the top left-hand corner, just beneath the article title.
The Privacy Newsfeed monitors over 300 global publications, of which more than 4,350 summary articles have been posted to the online archive dating back to the beginning of 2020. A weekly roundup is available by email every Friday.
